Views of Christianity and Islam Towards Trade

Christianity and Islam be ii of the most practiced religions in the world, and have been for centuries. These devil faiths atomic number 18 twain mo nonheistic, which means they worship one God, or Allah. Started over 2000 years ago, Christianity is ground on the teachings and life of Jesus Christ and was open up throughout the romish Empire. The religion of Islam began early in 600 C. E. by the prophet Muhammad, and he spread the word of Allah. These religions spread quickly in Europe and the Middle East. As they progressed, new avocation routes came about in these areas.Overtime, Christianity and Islam developed opinions about the trading and businesses activity and the state who pursued it. According to the religions consecrate books, the Bible and Quran, their views on conduct were different at premiere. Christians believed that peck should not transaction for it was not the pursuit of worldly concern. Moslems were much more tolerant of trade, as vast as merchan ts were honest in their bargaining. By 1000 C. E, some(prenominal) the religions attitudes towards trade had changed completely. Christian scholars began to teach that honest trade was acceptable, part Muslim scholars dictum the danger that trade brought to a mans soul.By the fifteenth century, attitudes towards trade had tear down more drastic change once again. Christianity espoused that trade was encouraged and worthy, art object Muslims believed merchants were corrupt. When the two religions kickoff began, Christianity and Islam differed at first on their views concerning trade. As stated in the Christian Bible, it is almost impossible for a loaded man to enter the kingdom of God ( roll 1). For Christians, at first they had to live a reduce life without making any profits.Its tell that it was easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. As for Muslims this differed because in the Quran, men were allowed to trade as dour as they were honest said in document 2. If the two parties speak the truth and make it manifest, their transaction shall be blessed, and if they overwhelm and tell and lie, the blessing of their transaction shall be obliterated. This means that if two people trade fairly amongst each another(prenominal) without cheating, then nothing is ill-use according to the Islam beliefs.If one of the men are cheated, then their business impart be wiped out. The point of document 1 was that Jesus was a execrable man, therefore his followers lived up to being poor as well. When Christianity started, Christians believed that in order to go to heaven, they must(prenominal) live a poor and humble life, like Jesus did. The same logic applies for Muslims in document 2, whos founder Muhammed was a wet merchant. In document two, the author is backing merchants and saying that they will be accepted by Allah as long as they are truthful.Muslims strongly believed that it was alright to be a wealthy merchant as long you are honest, like Muhammed. Therefore, the two religions were at first different because Christianity had negative views toward trade while Islam was for it and they were alike because the tenableness for their views twain traced back to their founders. In documents four and five, the view points of Christians and Muslims toward trade began to change. Christians, who were at first against trade and comme il faut wealthy from it, now say that it is okay to trade as long as you are honest.Stated in document four, No man should sell a thing to another man for more than its worth. This is saying that for men to do business with one another, they must not sell things for more than they are worth, or in other words scam each other. While Christian scholars are adequate more lenient towards trade than they were when the religion started, Islamic scholars are becoming more strict. Muslims now believe that selling things for a profit, even if it is ho nest, is ineluctably affecting the soul. These qualities school principal to a decrease and weakening in justice and manliness, (document five).The Islam look on trade now sees that the methods that trade employs are tricks aimed at making a profit by securing the difference between obtaining and selling prices. The two religions, however, are still somewhat similar because they some(prenominal) believe that trading for large profits can eventually lead to corruption of the soul. Views of trade by Christians and Muslims yet continued to change even further in documents six and heptad. It seems in document six as if Christians were being encouraged to trade as long as it mixed God.Religious paintings of Our Lady were being asked for, therefore Christians now want people to trade. as well in document six it is stated that, You know God has given you to acquire great riches in this world, may He be praised. It is now expected for Christian merchants to trade and use God while doing so. Overtime you can see the change on the views of trade, because at first Christians did not want anyone making a large profit. As for Muslims, merchants are loosing money from trading. In document seven, Sakaoglu Nasuh is an example of how over time the barter activity has affected his ethical customs. The aforementioned has now acted contrary to the rare custom. This is because he is buying all the cotton yarn and selling them for high prices. Hence, not giving the other merchants a fair opportunity to buy and sell the cotton as well. This is going against what the Islam religion believed, which is business activities are acceptable as long as you are not victorious vantage of others. The Islamic Court probably said this is document seven because they wanted to please the people and let them know that merchants must obey.The two religions continue to differ in these documents because Christians are now persuading people to trade, while Islam trading is becoming monop olized. However, Christianity and Islam are still alike in which they both use religion as an example. The attitudes of Christianity and Islam towards trade and merchants differed. When the two religions first began, they had polar views from each other. Christians saw trade and wealth as being cold from God and it was not approved. Muslims, on the other hand, tolerated trade as long as the two parties were honest and no one was taken advantage of.Later on, these views changed when Christians became more lenient and also accepted honest trade. Muslims then saw trade as inevitably affecting the soul when merchants became corrupt by outbidding other merchants. However, we would need additional documents such as documents from the common people in order to asses the consequences of the merchant activities. We do not know how the Christians or Muslims commoners viewed the trading business, therefore, we cannot fully understand all aspects of the religions towards it.